Solutions to the Problems
- a) Assuming the break points are chosen uniformly over the length of the
match, the pieces will form a triangle 1/4 of the time, b) The answer is
changed if we break the match in stages - now the probability is 2
∫01/2 x/(1-x) dx ≈ 0.386
- Consider √ 2 √ 2. If this number is
rational we are done and dusted, if it is not then raising it to the
power √ 2 gives a rational number: √ 2 √
2 √ 2 = 2. (Beware, some browsers have
trouble displaying these nested superscripts correctly.)
- In terms of the arrangement of the ants, a collision between two ants is equivalent to the ants just passing through one another. The ants are effectively indistinguishable for the purposes of the problem and can be treated as independent. Therefore, regardless of the number of ants, all of them will fall off within one hour. There are lots of arrangements that can attain this one hour time.
- Both numbers are the Golden ratio, (1+√ 5 )/2
- Using the fact that the total number of ways of pairing off the class is:
tot(N) = (N-1)*(N-3)*(N-5)...*1
Part 1) The fraction of same sex only combination is:
p(same sex only|N) = 0 if N odd
p(same sex only|N) = tot(N/2)2/tot(N) if N even
Part 2) The fraction of mixed only combinations is:
p(mixed only|N) = N!/tot(N)
- The top end accelerates quickly towards the bottom end, but the
bottom remains (approximately) fixed until the slinky has
contracted. To convince yourself, consider running the same experiment
using a spring with (unequal) masses at each end. Then generalise to a
chain of masses and springs.
- A surprisingly small 2 π metres (i.e. about 6metres)
- The solution is the Fibonacci sequence: f(N) = f(N-1) + f(N-2), where f(0)=1 and f(1)=1
- An approximate solution is informative: Imagine the related
problem where the mile of track was hinged at the middle and clamped
at the two ends, how high must the (hinge at) the mid-point rise when
you add a foot of extra track:
h = ( 2640.52 -
26402 )1/2 feet = 51 feet
Which was 51
times my initial ball-park guess and quite close to the answer for a
circle, which is 45 feet.
- Using the following strategy, the duck can escape even if the fox
is four times faster: First, the duck swims to a point where it can
circle round the centre of pond at a rate which is infinitesimally
faster than the fox. Second, the duck circles until it is on the
opposite side of the pond to the fox (this will take some
time...). Then, thirdly, the duck dashes to the pond's edge. The duck
will escape so long as its speed is greater than the 1/(1+π) times
the fox's speed.
- Prime numbers are odd and so we can let p=2k+1 where k=1,2,3,4 ... So, p2-1 = 4 k(k+1). As either k or k+1 are even, this means p2-1 must be divisible by 8. Now we need to show that it is also divisible by 3. First we note that a prime number greater than 3 is always one away from a number which is a multiple of 3. Thus, p ± 1 = 3 n (where ± means either/or but not both and n=1,2,3,4 ...). Therefore, p2-1 = 3(3 n ± 2), which indicates that 3 is a factor. This completes the proof.
- The square numbers (1,4,9,16...) remain heads up at the end of the process.
- For a full discussion of the problem and a solution please read this note.
- For a full discussion of the problem and a solution, please read this note.
Return to
the problems...
Return to main page