Dodgson and LoydIntroductionZoubin kicked off his tea talk on the 'Dutch book' with the following problem that can be solved by applying Bayes' theorem: A bag contains a counter, known to be either white or black. A white counter is put in, the bag is shaken, and a counter is drawn out, which proves to be white. What is now the chance of drawing a white counter? This problem occurs in the Pillow Book of Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson. Dodgson's pseudonym This was not the author's best known work:
Dodgson the man1832-1898
Dodgson the mathematician
He wrote 3 pamphlets on elections and committees, which it is argued; Dodgson's elections
Dodgson considered pairwise voting preferences in elections involving more than one person
he noted as the Marquis de Condorcet had before him that:
Example 1.
Example 2.
Example 3.
However, generally it is NP hard to determine the winner under this scheme - enter Arrow, Mackay etc. Another problem from the Pillow BookA cable hangs over a frictionless pulley. Now a weight which exactly balances the monkey hanging on the other side is attached to a massless cable. What happens to the weight if the monkey tries to climb up the cable?
Sam LoydLoyd was a;
A typical Loyd puzzle "Move the blocks about to bring them back to the present position in every respect except that the error in the 14 and 15 was corrected." A prize of $1000, offered for the first correct solution to the problem, has never been claimed, although there are thousands of persons who say they have performed the required feat. People became infatuated with the puzzle and there are stories of:
Loyd knew his $1000 was safe: the puzzle cannot be solved - only pairs of numbers can be transposed without cheating. A second puzzle from LoydCount the people, wait for the pieces to move, and count the people again; An explanation of the vanishing puzzleThe basic trick: But how do we place the people when we have vertical cuts too? A final quote and his obituary in the Times"Ideas came to [Loyd] with great fecundity, often too rapidly for him to analyse them completely. Yet his powers for rapid analysis were almost unrivalled. He could see an idea from many sides at once; first always from the point of view of a puzzle, then from the humorous standpoint, finally from the artistic aspect."
Richard Turner |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||